Literatures
Then, certain specialistic Literatures in human sciences recover decorating the man to try to make it an object that seems scientist. They took from science, not his oxygen of formation, but its language and its appearance, neither the more nor the less. Therefore, certain psychologists, baptize neuropsiclogos, use white mandiles, have their laboratories, measure, inform, etc. Or, in his laboratories, are some touch to verify them the volunteers, but voluntary who never they are defined! As far as the sociologists, they make statistics! They did not have, they, underlying models to the phenomena that they describe, cannot either, evidently, make nothing else that describe them (and not to explain them). But they describe how them? With numbers (of course that makes more well-known). But the statistic, is like computer science.
If the data that we trusted to him to the computer are idiots, because the computer is going to treat those stupid data (the computer is ready to treat absolutely everything). For the statistics, he is the same: to a stupid question, stupid answer. Briefly, having not taken from the science that only the appearance, that is to say computer science, the statistics or the laboratory, the object man (in small letter) spirit of the also virgin one who has entered. Although his human sciences do not have anything to do with science, but outside the flatterers whom they simply testify of the pretension of being literary and that they have never been able to construct his object scientifically. It was a frank gunner, Edgar Morn, that removed benefit from its concept of complexity. I do not say that he is idiot, on the contrary, but he thinks that there is to forget the past and to begin on new bases: the lost paradigm is definitively lost, but I, I am going to invent everything! .